Showing posts with label socialist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label socialist. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

The Gangster Government

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) speaking on the House floor:

Now weve moved into the realm of gangster government. We have gangster government when the Federal Government has set up a new cartel and private businesses now have to go begging with their hand out to their local hopefully well politically connected Congressman or their Senator so they can buy a peace offering for that local business. Is that the kind of country we are going to have in the future?




Watch and weep

Saturday, May 9, 2009

Tax Rap




Yo Mr. Prez... let's see some mo' of your smooth moves bro!



H/T Lady Cincinnatus

Sunday, March 22, 2009

The Obollywood Administration

Look, he's like Lincoln! No, he's like Reagan. Or like Truman maybe...
Welcome to the Obollywood administration: trying hard to imitate great American Presidents but ultimately only succeeding to embarrass our nation.


Raaa… ba ri da du ra raaaa…

So...

Listen and listen carefully
But first some applause
I’m singing the last song of the night
In the song I wish to say
Take my advice if you want to be happy
Ahooo, twistere!




Aho, aho, 800 billion, 1 trillion, 5 trillion
Ahoo, twistere!
We print tons of money to stimulate the economy
Ahoo, we stimulate !

Look no one knows yet
My heart loves you

I close Guantanamo, and let you stay in America
To be free and have Constitutional rights
You are not terrorists anymore
Europe, you can have a couple of them too!




We must meet because of destiny
We also create false promises

I gifted Gordon Brown
With a couple of American movies on DVD
Wrong region his DVD player displayed at home in London
So we sent another video to Teheran, saying "let's make peace"
Wrong region again, they said America must apologize first!




Superman! Superman!
I will start loving you and you will ask for more
I will let you enjoy me a little and tease you

New York Times and CNN, BBC and Al Jazeera
Putin and Ahmadinejad, Chavez and Sean Penn

Agea, agea, agea, aaa!
Ciuki ciuki delki bate
Iarkaren de!



Translated from patruped:bun biped:rau

Friday, March 20, 2009

Class: It Is Something You Either Have, Or You Don't

Respecting a tradition going back to the first Presidents of the US (less Clinton or Carter), Bush refuses to criticize the current President
Quote:
"I love my country a lot more than I love politics," Mr Bush said in Calgary, Canada. "I think it is essential that he (Obama) be helped in office."
Until Carter and Clinton who trampled this unwritten rule under their feet, it was a big taboo for an outgoing President to bash on the incoming President. I know it sure would be easy for Bush to say something like, "It's a lot harder than it looks isn't it Barak?"...
Yet Bush doesn't say a word about the performance of the current White House resident and on the contrary he asks the American people to support Obama.

Meanwhile at the White House, Obama found the culprit for the current economic mess. It's Bush, of course. The fact that for 5 years we enjoyed unprecedented economic growth combined with record low unemployment numbers and the economic downturn coincided with the Democrats gaining control of the Congress, that's just a coincidence.

Yep...it is true what they say about class. You either have it or you don't.

Monday, March 9, 2009

Sunday, February 22, 2009

Dr. Obama's Sensational New Discovery: "ISM"

Did you heard?
"America embraced socialISM"



Thanks but no thanks, I already had ISM in Romania for 26 years. So please Make Mine Freedom.

Thursday, February 5, 2009

The New Prohibition Era of Guns Under Obama

Worth reading article written by John Baden at Opposing Views

I pity those fools who still believe Democrats "learned their lesson" not to mess with another gun ban or that "Obama has too much on his hands" to push for new anti-gun legislation.
The truth is:
1. Democrats never learn from their own mistakes (otherwise they wouldn't be Democrats) and,
2. Obama has plenty of mainstream media ass kissers at his disposal who are more than happy to start an anti-gun public swaying campaign for him.
Just wait for the next mad gunman incident and you'll see how every talking head on MSNBCABCCBSCNN will start putting up heartbreaking stories about innocent victims of gun violence with carefully selected videos of mothers, fathers and neighbors in tears crying "why isn't the President doing anything about guns?"
Then you'll see how busy Obama really is.

The New Prohibition Era of Guns Under Obama

People employ state power when moral persuasion fails. Politically legitimized coercion and constraint can generate hugely beneficial reform. The Voting Rights Act of 1964 is one example; environmental laws provide other examples.

In contrast, America's Eighteenth Amendment, prohibiting the manufacture and sale of alcohol for consumers' pleasure, was a huge failure. Industrial alcohol remained legal after the 1920 Volstead Act and medical use was often tolerated, giving rise to winking and cheating.

The predictable consequences were negative on balance: petty and organized crime, loss of tax revenue, and illness and death from tainted substitutes.
John D. Rockefeller noted, "...many of our best citizens have openly ignored Prohibition; respect for the law has been greatly lessened; and crime has increased to a [new] level."

In addition to the social, cultural, and economic costs of Prohibition, the liturgical churches, Episcopal, Lutheran, and Roman Catholic, challenged its moral legitimacy. Naturally, the soft drink industry supported "dry laws" as did bootleggers. When the results of this failed experiment became overwhelming, the Twenty-First Amendment repealed Prohibition in 1933.

There's a parallel between this failed effort and current laws outlawing recreational drugs. Powerful constituencies have developed on several sides, including law enforcement. However honorable the intent and sincere the convictions of those using government to channel or constrain behavior, legal prohibitions naturally and normally generate political corruption and illegal suppliers. Across time and cultures, that's the result.

Given America's drift, and now run, from the libertarian principles of our founders, many individuals fear additional prohibitions. For example, on November 6th, the NYT wrote of a substantial surge in gun sales as buyers become "concerned that an Obama administration will curtail their right to bear arms." A Houston gun shop owner declared, "[Obama] wants to take our guns and create a socialist society." The FBI reported that, during election week, background checks used to approve gun purchases increased 49 percent compared to the same week in 2007.

On November 10th the WSJ published this: "Last week President-elect Obama's Web site...posted his administration's agenda for curtailing the Second Amendment rights of law abiding Americans, thereby validating the concerns of gun owners, sportsmen and firearms enthusiasts all across the country." A December poll by Southwick Associates found that 80 percent of shooters expect the new administration to make the purchase of firearms more difficult.

However valid these fears, on January 16th Fox News reported that, "President-elect...Obama's election has spurred a surge in gun sales...as gun owners brace for what they believe will be a new era of gun control in Washington."

Some academic friends attribute this to the paranoia of gun owners. But sometimes people really are out to control or constrain you. And advocacy groups such as the NRA have strong incentives to generate concern.

Consider attention given to Harvard law professor Cass Sunstein, Obama's pick for OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. I admire Cass' work even when I disagree. Friends at the University of Chicago speak so highly of him that I've invited him to FREE's conferences.

Equally informed, honest people often have policy disagreements. For example, consider Sunstein's 2007 speech reported in the Harvard Crimson:
"We ought to ban hunting, I suggest, if there isn't a purpose other than sport and fun. That should be against the law. It's time now."

It is logically possible to be anti-hunting and yet support private gun ownership. Last June Cass wrote in a Boston Globe column, "To be sure, everyone should agree that the Second Amendment creates some kind of individual right." Cass may be an enthusiastic target shooter. Only Click and Clack of NPR's "Car Talk" support the fictive "Save the Skeet Foundation" However, those who value gun ownership see a short step from anti-hunting to anti-gun.

If people anticipated a return to Prohibition, many would stock up on Scotch and wine. Likewise with guns and ammo. And unlike wine, if properly cared for guns last and work well for many decades.

Our Second Amendment is based on fear of abusive government, not duck hunting. Many find personal defense increasingly important. Friends of liberty and security act on these considerations. It's naïve to ignore these philosophically and historically justified forces.

Sunday, February 1, 2009

Hypocrisy, Thy Name Is Obama

May 16, 2008:
Obama speaking at a campaign rally in Rosebud, OR

"We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times ... and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK,"

Jan. 28, 2009:
David Axelrod explaining why Obama was seen without his suit jacket on in the Oval Office:

“He’s from Hawaii, O.K.? He likes it warm. You could grow orchids in there.”


Hypocrisy. It's what's for breakfast, lunch and dinner at the Obama White House.

White House Legal Eagles: "Commercial Use" Of Obama Must Be Controlled

During the 2008 Presidential campaign for empty-suit Obama image and advertising was everything; remember the hour-long infomercials he saturated the TV airwaves with?
However, since he became President, Obama realized capitalism is bad and advertising must have government imposed limits:


White House Lawyers Look to Limit Commercial Use of President

White House lawyers want to control the use of the president’s image, recognizing the worldwide fascination about Obama’s election, First Amendment free-speech rights and easy access to videos and photos on the Web.

“Our lawyers are working on developing a policy that will protect the presidential image while being careful not to squelch the overwhelming enthusiasm that the public has for the president,” White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki said.

Obama’s calls for change and his “Yes We Can” campaign mantra are being evoked to sell assembly-required furniture in Ikea’s “Embrace Change” marketing campaign, bargain airfares during Southwest Airlines Inc.’s “Yes You Can” sale and “Yes Pecan” ice cream at Ben & Jerry’s Homemade Inc. shops. Read more here

Oops! Too late...


UPI: Police seize 'Obama' brand heroin





Obama is on a roll...

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Obama's White House: The Perfect Habitat For Cockroaches


They've been hiding for years, but Washington's gun ban extremists are baaaack

By Gerard Valentino

Like cockroaches waiting for the lights to go out before scurrying out into the open, the anti-gunners have sulked in their little holes, feeding off political scraps while we were increasing the pro-gun footprint. While the anti-gunners hid, pro-gunners were so successful that only two states don't allow legal concealed carry. The anti-gun leadership absorbed their losses and waited a long time for the pendulum to swing back in their favor.



Now that the Democrats control Congress, they see it as the cue to scurry from their hiding places. Their plan is to take away private ownership of guns in America.

Despite their failures over the years, their current plan is devoid of new strategies which leave little hope for success. Americans have grown tired of the lies, poor prognostications and outright falsification they use as "proof" that guns are a threat to public safety.

As it stands, their movement's mission statement seems to be, "we are the enlightened in society who know what is best for you and your family, so since guns scare us so they should scare you too."

Adding to their headache is the success of concealed carry laws across the United States. The laws put more guns on the street without the anti-gun gang's predicted increase in violent gun deaths. That won't stop the anti-gun groups from making up statistics to prove otherwise, since dishonesty is part of their M.O., and has been for years.



Cockroaches seem to survive just about anything, and untold years of evolution made them a freak of nature. Anti-gunners, on the other hand, only have their failed social experiment combined with a willingness to throw integrity and honesty in the garbage. They also seem to have a never-ending supply of logically challenged, emotion-based hypothetical arguments.

Yet, like cockroaches they survive political disasters to dredge up their silly arguments after every high profile crime committed with a gun.

The media plays a big role in keeping the anti-gun message in front of the American people, and in states like Ohio there is and undeniable anti-gun bias in all forms of mass communication. Without the media and their willingness to place blame after every spree killing, the anti-gun organizations would dry up and blow away in the wind. Just like what my dog leaves in the backyard.

Just about every spree killing over the last 40 years happened in a "gun free" zone. We don't want to get into an explanation of why "gun-free" zones are an invitation to criminals. Without a doubt, "gun free" zones are the epitome of legislators feeling like they have to do something to protect the children.


Clearly, the "gun-free" school zone legislation was passed without required foresight, since hundreds of lives were lost over the years because criminals know schools are possibly the softest target in America. Leaving America's most vital resource at the whim of typical street scum, or people with a serious mental illness, is nothing short of insane.

Our children deserve protection at all costs, and clearly we have failed them by allowing a very small minority of anti-gun crusaders to run roughshod over the opinion of the majority of Americans. It is a sad state of affairs that will change only when the right to bear arms is returned properly to the American people. When that happens, teachers, parents and administrators will again have the ability to protect children.

The cockroaches come out of the woodwork to blame the pro-gun lobby whenever a spree killing happens, whether at a school, at the mall or at a workplace. But, it is the cockroaches' own policies which disarm law-abiding people making such attacks so easy. They can't make the logical leap required to understand that each time an honest person resists with a gun the net gain to society as a whole is immeasurable.

Criminals are cowards, and if they have to stare down the barrel of a gun, any gun, the next time a criminal plans a crime they will worry about an armed victim.


Americans spoke at the ballot box over the years and are solidly in favor of letting honest people use firearms for self-protection. With an avowed gun-snatcher in the White House, it won't be easy to counter the presidential bully pulpit, but we did it during the Clinton years. President Obama did a good job of hiding his anti-gun ways during the election and fooled millions of gun owners. Now that he is locked into a stance if he changes it gun owners will turn on him – quickly.

Anti-gun crusaders don' believe that guns are ever used in self-defense, and that guns are, by their very existence, pure evil. How an object devoid of thought, feeling or emotions can be evil is beyond the grasp of most Americans. Anti-gun groups are losing support due to their backwards stance on guns, not only has the grassroots deserted them, but large donors as well.


Like a cockroach searching for food, very little can dissuade the anti-gun gangs from their self-appointed duty of disarming honest people. It is our job to exterminate their backwards elitist agenda from the market place of ideas since their favorite line, "if it only saves one life," only applies to victims who refuse to resist with a gun.

If you use a gun and kill your attacker, the anti-gun crusaders equate such an action with a drive-by shooting that kills indiscriminately. Nothing is considered evil in the anti-gun platform, except the gun itself. Blaming an inanimate object, instead of the person wielding the device, takes a certain lack of logical reasoning that many Americans can't wrap their mind around.


That doesn't stop the anti-gunners from pouring out of the woodwork to blame a gun whenever a high-profile murder takes place.

When people see cockroaches pouring from their woodwork it is certainly disconcerting and can ruin an otherwise nice place to live. To combat the infestation a well-known commercial product is often used – the Roach Motel, where roaches check in, but never check out.

Anti-gun crusaders have their version of the Roach Motel – logic.

Once you get an anti-gunner in a debate over gun rights, wait a little while and then throw logic into the equation. They will be trapped because like the Roach Motel, they thought one thing when the debate began, and now you're pulling a bait and switch, leaving them without recourse. You also took away their one recourse when beaten in the marketplace of ideas – the ability to check out.