Just listen to these morons:
Are these the people that spawned the Obamatons of today?
Just imagine how the new Eastern Europe democracies would look right now if Carter would have been elected for the second term. If you can't visualize that, just take a look at Iran, one of Carter's most enduring legacies.
H/T IOwnTheWorld
“Tell everyone that there is still a place in the Kingdom of Romania which has not bowed to Communism. As long as our heads are on our shoulders, this corner of the country will be free. Tell the people not to lose faith, for the day will come when the whole of Romania will be free. Pray God for it, so help us God.” --Ioan Gavrila Ogoranu, Romanian anti-communist fighter 1923-2006
Showing posts with label marxist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label marxist. Show all posts
Thursday, June 25, 2009
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
The Gangster Government
Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) speaking on the House floor:
Watch and weep
Now weve moved into the realm of gangster government. We have gangster government when the Federal Government has set up a new cartel and private businesses now have to go begging with their hand out to their local hopefully well politically connected Congressman or their Senator so they can buy a peace offering for that local business. Is that the kind of country we are going to have in the future?
Watch and weep
Thursday, April 16, 2009
The Last Supper At CNBC?
CNBC SWEATS 'OBAMA-BASHING'
NY Post, April 16, 2009 --
THE top suits and some of the on-air talent at CNBC were recently ordered to a top-secret meeting with General Electric CEO Jeffrey Immelt and NBC Universal President Jeff Zucker to discuss whether they've turned into the President Obama-bashing network, Page Six has learned.
"It was an intensive, three-hour dinner at 30 Rock which Zucker himself was behind," a source familiar with the powwow told us. "There was a long discussion about whether CNBC has become too conservative and is beating up on Obama too much. There's great concern that CNBC is now the anti-Obama network. The whole meeting was really kind of creepy."

Woe to the man who betrays the Son of Man!
It would be better for him if he had not been born--(Mark 14:20-21)
One topic under the microscope, our insider said, was on-air CNBC editor Rick Santelli's rant two months ago about staging a "Chicago Tea Party" to protest the president's bailout programs -- an idea that spawned tax protest tea parties in other big cities, infuriating the White House. Oddly, Santelli was not at the meeting, while Jim Cramer was, noted our source, who added that no edict was ultimately handed down by the network chieftains.
CNBC flack Brian Steel confirmed the get-together, but insisted: "The dinner was to thank CNBC for a job well done in our in-depth reporting throughout the financial crisis. As far as our coverage is concerned, we are built for balance and we are unabashedly pro-investor."
Our source retorted: "That is complete bull[bleep] . . . they didn't invite a lot of people to [the meeting]. There were many staffers who were working 24/7 during the crisis who weren't asked to attend, even Santelli, who was a big star for the network during those weeks. Why not?"
In addition, the insider said: "News of the meeting is starting to leak out and people are contacting a number of the on-air people to ask if they've been muzzled by GE."
NY Post, April 16, 2009 --
THE top suits and some of the on-air talent at CNBC were recently ordered to a top-secret meeting with General Electric CEO Jeffrey Immelt and NBC Universal President Jeff Zucker to discuss whether they've turned into the President Obama-bashing network, Page Six has learned.
"It was an intensive, three-hour dinner at 30 Rock which Zucker himself was behind," a source familiar with the powwow told us. "There was a long discussion about whether CNBC has become too conservative and is beating up on Obama too much. There's great concern that CNBC is now the anti-Obama network. The whole meeting was really kind of creepy."

Woe to the man who betrays the Son of Man!
It would be better for him if he had not been born--(Mark 14:20-21)
One topic under the microscope, our insider said, was on-air CNBC editor Rick Santelli's rant two months ago about staging a "Chicago Tea Party" to protest the president's bailout programs -- an idea that spawned tax protest tea parties in other big cities, infuriating the White House. Oddly, Santelli was not at the meeting, while Jim Cramer was, noted our source, who added that no edict was ultimately handed down by the network chieftains.
CNBC flack Brian Steel confirmed the get-together, but insisted: "The dinner was to thank CNBC for a job well done in our in-depth reporting throughout the financial crisis. As far as our coverage is concerned, we are built for balance and we are unabashedly pro-investor."
Our source retorted: "That is complete bull[bleep] . . . they didn't invite a lot of people to [the meeting]. There were many staffers who were working 24/7 during the crisis who weren't asked to attend, even Santelli, who was a big star for the network during those weeks. Why not?"
In addition, the insider said: "News of the meeting is starting to leak out and people are contacting a number of the on-air people to ask if they've been muzzled by GE."
Monday, April 6, 2009
The Mainstream Media Long, Agonizing Death
What happens when a business, any business puts a sign on the entrance door saying "we don't serve no stinking conservatives"?
If you guessed the business will lose roughly 50% of its customers you got it right. And replacing that sign with another one saying "going out of business" is only a matter of time.
Well, this simple concept of not discriminating against certain categories of customers seems to be too complicated to comprehend to the enlightened, open-minded liberals who run the mainstream media. To them, being Democrat ideologues and lapdogs for Obama trumps over their duty to be impartial observers and reporters of the news.
The result? The liberals in the media don't serve all their customers anymore, they only serve the 50% that agrees with them politically. The other 50% who they refuse to serve (or even badmouths) stops buying their product and refuse to put money in their pockets. Simple economics the mind of a liberal would never understand.
Here is another real life example of how this failure of the media management to serve all readers not only the liberal ones is claiming another victim: The Boston Globe.
I have a suggestion for an emergency plan that may help cut costs and keep them afloat for a while: lay off all the reporters, you don't need them. Their news come from one source: the Democrat National Committee.
If you guessed the business will lose roughly 50% of its customers you got it right. And replacing that sign with another one saying "going out of business" is only a matter of time.
Well, this simple concept of not discriminating against certain categories of customers seems to be too complicated to comprehend to the enlightened, open-minded liberals who run the mainstream media. To them, being Democrat ideologues and lapdogs for Obama trumps over their duty to be impartial observers and reporters of the news.
The result? The liberals in the media don't serve all their customers anymore, they only serve the 50% that agrees with them politically. The other 50% who they refuse to serve (or even badmouths) stops buying their product and refuse to put money in their pockets. Simple economics the mind of a liberal would never understand.
Here is another real life example of how this failure of the media management to serve all readers not only the liberal ones is claiming another victim: The Boston Globe.
Details of threat to close Globe emerge
Storm over Morrissey Boulevard
There’s a mutinous mood on Morrissey Boulevard, as Boston Globe staffers lash out over a stunning ultimatum from parent company The New York Times [NYT] Co.
“They’re nickel-and-diming people,” said a Globe union official who spoke on condition of anonymity, adding that top executives at The New York Times Co., which owns the Globe, “have ruined” the sagging broadsheet.
On Thursday, Times executives told representatives from the Boston paper’s 13 unions that they must trim $20 million from their budgets by May 1 or the Times would shut the paper down.
The move came days after the Globe reduced its newsroom work force by about 70 employees, full and part time, through a mix of voluntary buyouts and layoffs.
“We’re going to go through the same thing three months later,” said a frustrated union boss.
Other outraged Globe staffers and area union leaders yesterday accused the Times of bullying tactics designed to make the money losing Morrissey Boulevard paper more attractive to a potential buyer, or just strongarm long-sought concessions from unions.
“They are trying to strip it down to the bare bones, and then they are either going to sell it or go all digital,” said a Globe union official.
“If you are a business owner, and you are looking to squeeze costs, this is the perfect time,” said another local union honcho.
Other Globe staffers grieved and worried for their paper. They spoke on condition of anonymity, citing the climate at the newspaper.
“A lot of people are really sad,” said one Globe reporter.
Times management declined to comment again yesterday.
Sources yesterday described an heated and acrimonious mood in the meeting between representatives of 13 Globe unions and Times and Globe executives who presented the deadline threat. They spoke on condition of anonymity, citing the climate at the newspaper.
“They were crying poormouth,” a union member said, “saying there’s no advertising revenues. Of course there’s no revenue. They just fired about 50 advertising solicitors three months ago.”
One union official pointed out to the Globe brass that company managers received bonuses earlier this year. “That set them back,” a union source said.
Boston Newspaper Guild President Daniel Totten, who represents the paper’s largest union, issued a memo Friday to members saying the unions have already given up more than their fair share in recent years.
But newspaper analysts say the guild is likely to give in to management demands, which include proposals for pay cuts, the end of pension contributions and the elimination of lifetime job guarantees for longtime staffers.
“They will give in, right away,” said Douglas McIntyre, editor of 24/7 Wall Street, a New York financial media company. “A 20 percent cut is better than a 100 percent job loss.”
The Globe — which was bought in 1993 in a $1.1 billion New England media package — reportedly is on track to lose $85 million this year without the concessions. The Times Company lost almost $58 million last year.
Those losses come amid an unforgiving climate for print media: In the past month, the revenue-losing Rocky Mountain News closed, the Chicago Sun-Times declared bankruptcy, and the Seattle Post- Intelligencer laid off almost its entire staff and went online.
“The New York Times Company can’t afford to keep the Boston Globe open,” McIntyre said. “The Globe lost $50 million last year, and that could keep going up.”
Source
I have a suggestion for an emergency plan that may help cut costs and keep them afloat for a while: lay off all the reporters, you don't need them. Their news come from one source: the Democrat National Committee.
Thursday, March 26, 2009
Look Who Is Doing Great Financially...
"Never let a good crisis go to waste".
Some may think these words were first spoken by Obama's #1 Gauleiter, Herr Rahm Emanuel.
I have my doubts about that. I believe "Dead Fish" Emanuel learned these words from George Soros - scavenger billionaire, former Nazi collaborator, promoter of the one world government and rightful owner of the Democrat Party:
But...but...but...he's a Mecena, a benefactor for the poor and the hungry he gives millions to underdeveloped countries, liberals cry.
Yes you morons, but that's just another investment of his. He's buying entire countries and their corrupt government for cheap. The Mafia Dons are also helping the poor; that's how their recruit their future soldiers.
Some may think these words were first spoken by Obama's #1 Gauleiter, Herr Rahm Emanuel.
I have my doubts about that. I believe "Dead Fish" Emanuel learned these words from George Soros - scavenger billionaire, former Nazi collaborator, promoter of the one world government and rightful owner of the Democrat Party:
I have never understood how anti-capitalist liberals let themselves and their ideals to be purchased at wholesale prices by a man who is the embodiment of what they hate most: a capitalist shark. And not just any kind of capitalist shark; the Great White of the financial speculators, a man so ruthless and so greedy he brings entire nations to ruin just to fill up his bank accounts and satisfy his mega-ego.
UK's Daily Mail:
'I'm having a very good crisis,' says Soros as hedge fund managers make billions off recession
A hedge fund manager who predicted the global credit crunch has said the financial crisis has been 'stimulating' and the culmination of his life's work.
George Soros, who predicted the global financial crisis twice before, was one of the few people to anticipate and prepare for the current economic collapse.
Mr Soros said his prediction meant he was better able to brace his Quantum investment fund against the gloabal storm.
But other investors failed to take notice of his prediction and his decision to come out of retirement in 2007 to manage the fund made him $US2.9 billion.
And while the financial crisis continued to deepen across the globe, the 78-year-old still managed to make $1.1 billion last year.
'It is, in a way, the culminating point of my life’s work,' he told national newspaper The Australian.
Soros is one of 25, top hedge fund managers from across Wall Street who have defied the credit crunch crisis to reap a total of $11.6billion (£7.9bn) last year.
But...but...but...he's a Mecena, a benefactor for the poor and the hungry he gives millions to underdeveloped countries, liberals cry.
Yes you morons, but that's just another investment of his. He's buying entire countries and their corrupt government for cheap. The Mafia Dons are also helping the poor; that's how their recruit their future soldiers.
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Video: Mandatory Volunteerism
Obama promised during the campaign to create a Socialist National Civilian Security Force similar to what they have in other Marxist regimes. Yesterday, the US House took the first step in organizing Dear Leader's dream youth service corp.
The House passed the Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education Act yesterday. The bill includes language indicating young people will be forced to participate in mandatory national service programs. The bill also states that "service learning" will be a mandatory part of the youth curriculum.
That doesn't sound much like "volunteerism" does it?
Here is a brilliant video illustrating the hypocrisy of president 0bama (yes, I refuse to write with capital letters) and his dangerous, destructive political ambitions to force our kids in his private army, the Obama Jugend (officially known as the National Civilian Security Force).
From the author:
The House passed the Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education Act yesterday. The bill includes language indicating young people will be forced to participate in mandatory national service programs. The bill also states that "service learning" will be a mandatory part of the youth curriculum.
That doesn't sound much like "volunteerism" does it?
Here is a brilliant video illustrating the hypocrisy of president 0bama (yes, I refuse to write with capital letters) and his dangerous, destructive political ambitions to force our kids in his private army, the Obama Jugend (officially known as the National Civilian Security Force).
From the author:
I shot this video before the bill was passed in Congress and the words "mandatory service" were removed -section 6104 of original bill :
http://tinyurl.com/cpdv63
However, I decided to post the video anyway as the fact that "mandatory" was in to begin with is a cause for concern! We must pay attention, that it is not re-introduced in another bill or by Senate. We must stay on our toes!
By these statements made by Rahm Emanuel and Obama, we know mandatory service is on their minds:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvQKlO...
Also check out H.R. 1444 and the National Civilian Community Corps
http://www.infowars.com/house-passes-...
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.ph...
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE....
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/...
For more information on civil war here is a site that states it the reasons concisely:
http://americanhistory.about.com/od/c...
http://militaryhistory.about.com/od/c...
and another:
http://www.greatamericanhistory.net/c...
Monday, March 23, 2009
Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?
The cancer spreads. A salary cap on YOUR job is next.
And let us not forget: the biggest crook of them all is the Government, particularly this one we have right now.
Timothy Geithner, Ron Kirk, Hilda Solis, Nancy Killefer, Rahm Emanuel and other tax cheats and crooks that we don't even yet know about. Yep, that's a brilliant idea! Let's put the tax cheats and crooks from the Obama administration in charge of supervising other tax cheats and crooks.
Change!
Drudge:
"Obama will call for increased oversight of 'executive pay at all banks, Wall Street firms and possibly other companies' as part of sweeping plan to 'overhaul financial regulation', NY TIMES reporting Sunday, newsroom sources tell DRUDGE... Developing...
And let us not forget: the biggest crook of them all is the Government, particularly this one we have right now.
Timothy Geithner, Ron Kirk, Hilda Solis, Nancy Killefer, Rahm Emanuel and other tax cheats and crooks that we don't even yet know about. Yep, that's a brilliant idea! Let's put the tax cheats and crooks from the Obama administration in charge of supervising other tax cheats and crooks.
Change!
Sunday, March 22, 2009
The Obollywood Administration
Look, he's like Lincoln! No, he's like Reagan. Or like Truman maybe...
Welcome to the Obollywood administration: trying hard to imitate great American Presidents but ultimately only succeeding to embarrass our nation.
Translated from patruped:bun biped:rau
Welcome to the Obollywood administration: trying hard to imitate great American Presidents but ultimately only succeeding to embarrass our nation.
Raaa… ba ri da du ra raaaa…
So...
Listen and listen carefully
But first some applause
I’m singing the last song of the night
In the song I wish to say
Take my advice if you want to be happy
Ahooo, twistere!
Aho, aho, 800 billion, 1 trillion, 5 trillion
Ahoo, twistere!
We print tons of money to stimulate the economy
Ahoo, we stimulate !
Look no one knows yet
My heart loves you
I close Guantanamo, and let you stay in America
To be free and have Constitutional rights
You are not terrorists anymore
Europe, you can have a couple of them too!
We must meet because of destiny
We also create false promises
I gifted Gordon Brown
With a couple of American movies on DVD
Wrong region his DVD player displayed at home in London
So we sent another video to Teheran, saying "let's make peace"
Wrong region again, they said America must apologize first!
Superman! Superman!
I will start loving you and you will ask for more
I will let you enjoy me a little and tease you
New York Times and CNN, BBC and Al Jazeera
Putin and Ahmadinejad, Chavez and Sean Penn
Agea, agea, agea, aaa!
Ciuki ciuki delki bate
Iarkaren de!
Translated from patruped:bun biped:rau
Friday, March 20, 2009
Class: It Is Something You Either Have, Or You Don't
Respecting a tradition going back to the first Presidents of the US (less Clinton or Carter), Bush refuses to criticize the current President
Until Carter and Clinton who trampled this unwritten rule under their feet, it was a big taboo for an outgoing President to bash on the incoming President. I know it sure would be easy for Bush to say something like, "It's a lot harder than it looks isn't it Barak?"...
Yet Bush doesn't say a word about the performance of the current White House resident and on the contrary he asks the American people to support Obama.
Meanwhile at the White House, Obama found the culprit for the current economic mess. It's Bush, of course. The fact that for 5 years we enjoyed unprecedented economic growth combined with record low unemployment numbers and the economic downturn coincided with the Democrats gaining control of the Congress, that's just a coincidence.
Yep...it is true what they say about class. You either have it or you don't.
Quote:
| "I love my country a lot more than I love politics," Mr Bush said in Calgary, Canada. "I think it is essential that he (Obama) be helped in office." |
Yet Bush doesn't say a word about the performance of the current White House resident and on the contrary he asks the American people to support Obama.
Meanwhile at the White House, Obama found the culprit for the current economic mess. It's Bush, of course. The fact that for 5 years we enjoyed unprecedented economic growth combined with record low unemployment numbers and the economic downturn coincided with the Democrats gaining control of the Congress, that's just a coincidence.
Yep...it is true what they say about class. You either have it or you don't.
Friday, March 13, 2009
We Get The Money, You Keep The Change Presents: Maxine Waters, The Poor Black People Advocate

Wall Street Journal:
Waters Helped Bank Whose Stock She Owned
California Democrat Has Championed Minority-Owned One United on Capitol Hill and Criticized Its Government Regulators
By SUSAN SCHMIDT
WASHINGTON -- When Rep. Barney Frank was looking to aid a Boston-based lender last fall, the Massachusetts Democrat urged Maxine Waters, a colleague on the House Financial Services Committee, to "stay out of it," he says.
The reason: Ms. Waters, a longtime congresswoman from California, had close ties to the minority-owned institution, OneUnited Bank.
Ms. Waters and her husband have both held financial stakes in the bank. Until recently, her husband was a director. At the same time, Ms. Waters has publicly boosted OneUnited's executives and criticized its government regulators during congressional hearings. Last fall, she helped secure the bank a meeting with Treasury officials.
Her involvement isn't new. Ms. Waters has detailed her financial ties in a series of federal disclosure forms and has been vocal in public in support of the bank. Those ties, however, have received little public attention. Nor is it well known how the influential lawmaker has over the years acted to support the bank and its executives.
Such potential conflicts of interest are more serious as the banking system's crisis has led the government to take an increasingly active role in overseeing financial institutions, including OneUnited. The financial-services committee on which Ms. Waters sits oversees banking issues, and the lawmaker is a potential future chairman.
Representatives of the bank and Ms. Waters didn't return calls seeking comment. Ms. Waters's congressional staff didn't respond to written questions about her and her husband's relationship with the bank.
Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics, a watchdog group, says Ms. Waters should have recused herself from any matters involving the bank. If her support helped OneUnited, "it was a disservice to her constituents," Ms. Krumholz says.
Ms. Waters, who represents inner-city Los Angeles, hasn't made a secret of her family's financial interest in OneUnited. Referring to her family's investment, she said in 2007 during a congressional hearing that for African-Americans, "the test of your commitment to economic expansion and development and support for business is whether or not you put your money where your mouth is."
OneUnited's executives have donated $12,500 to Ms. Waters's election campaigns.

Through a series of acquisitions, OneUnited grew to become what it says is the largest African-American-owned bank in the country. It once counted the late Motown Records boss Jheryl Busby as a vice chairman.
Ms. Waters and her husband, Sidney Williams, were investors in two African-American owned California banks that merged with other lenders in 2002 to form OneUnited. Congressional financial-disclosure forms show Ms. Waters acquired OneUnited stock worth between $250,000 and $500,000 in March 2004, as did Mr. Williams. Mr. Williams joined the board of OneUnited that year.
Each sold shares in September 2004 -- including Ms. Waters's entire stake -- but Mr. Williams continued to hold varying amount of the company's stock. In the lawmaker's most recent financial-disclosure form, dated May 2008 and covering the prior year, Ms. Waters reported that her husband held between $250,000 and $500,000 worth of the bank's stock.
Getty ImagesMr. Williams also received interest payments from a separate holding at the bank, also worth between $250,000 and $500,000. The 2008 form doesn't specify what that is. Mr. Williams stepped down from the bank's board last spring. It couldn't be learned whether he still owns stock in the bank. Mr. Williams didn't return calls seeking comment.
At a hearing on minority lending in 2007, Ms. Waters criticized regulators for not doing enough to help minority banks stave off mergers with non-minority institutions. The lawmaker said she had contacted the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. in 2002 over such concerns and "I was told that there was nothing that could be done."
In her 2007 remarks, Ms. Waters alluded to two banks, Independence Bank of Washington, D.C., and "another bank that was about to be acquired by a major white bank out of Illinois."
Ms. Waters didn't mention that OneUnited had been an unsuccessful suitor of Independence, which had been taken over several years earlier. The second bank, which she didn't name, appears to have been Family Savings Bank of Los Angeles. In 2002, that bank backed out of a merger agreement with FBOP Bank of Oak Brook, Ill., and shortly afterward was acquired by OneUnited.
News reports at the time credited the intervention of Ms. Waters and others for Family Savings's change of heart.
At the hearing, Ms. Waters praised OneUnited's senior counsel, Robert P. Cooper, as "typical of the young, brilliant minds that have been amassed at OneUnited Bank."
OneUnited's minority-lending record is mixed. The bank received "outstanding" Community Reinvestment Act ratings for lending in Los Angeles. It has weak ratings in Massachusetts and failed to meet minimum standards in Florida.
In January, Ms. Waters acknowledged she made a call to the Treasury on OneUnited's behalf. The bank's capital, which was heavily invested in shares of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, was all but wiped out with the federal takeover of the two mortgage giants, and the bank was seeking help from regulators.
OneUnited eventually secured bailout funds under the government's $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, which was set up later that month.
In a brief interview in January, Ms. Waters said she was unaware the bank received $12 million of TARP money, which arrived in December. OneUnited was "just a small" bank, she said.
A provision designed to aid OneUnited was written into the federal bailout legislation by Mr. Frank, who is chairman of the financial-services panel. Mr. Frank has said he inserted the provision to help the only African-American owned bank in his home state. He said in an interview that Ms. Waters's interest "had zero impact on the outcome because I would have done it anyway."
In October, regulators demanded that OneUnited raise fresh capital and name an independent board. The bank was ordered to stop paying for a Porsche used by one of its executives and its chairman's $6.4 million beachfront home in Pacific Palisades, Calif., a luxury enclave between Malibu and Santa Monica.

Thursday, March 12, 2009
Economy Tough? Start Your Own Business: Be A Soft Drink Entrepreneur!

Create your own brand of soda! Safe, fun and...until Obama finds about it, still legal.
The carbonated drink millionaire maker website is here: Soft Drink Generator
Monday, March 9, 2009
Saturday, March 7, 2009
It's Over: The Taliban Defeated America
...with a little help from their friend Hussein Al-Ameriki who lives at the White House, of course.
NY Slimes writes:
Don't you love this guy? He made the same the surge will fail, America has lost the war prediction less than two years ago. Must give it to him: he never changes his opinion about America being defeated from one year to another.
Mr President...I have a question please. According to you, which ones are the moderate Taliban you are planning to sit at the negotiation table and sign our surrendering armistice?
This guy here? Is he a moderate?

...these ones?

...or maybe these ones?

Pick any of them, your choice Mr. President. It doesn't really matter to whom you are surrendering the free world, anyway.
NY Slimes writes:
"President Obama declared in an interview that the United States was not winning the war in Afghanistan and opened the door to a reconciliation process in which the American military would reach out to moderate elements of the Taliban"
Don't you love this guy? He made the same the surge will fail, America has lost the war prediction less than two years ago. Must give it to him: he never changes his opinion about America being defeated from one year to another.
Mr President...I have a question please. According to you, which ones are the moderate Taliban you are planning to sit at the negotiation table and sign our surrendering armistice?
This guy here? Is he a moderate?

...these ones?

...or maybe these ones?

Pick any of them, your choice Mr. President. It doesn't really matter to whom you are surrendering the free world, anyway.
Two Presidents, Two Shoe Throwers, Same Media
A few months ago an Iraqi throws a shoe at President Bush during a press conference; the Western mainstream media and leftist blog reaction is to call the man a hero.
In their opinion Bush was evil incarnate and he had it coming; you cannot help but notice how many left wingers could barely help themselves not to express their disappointment the assailant didn't had a gun.
Yesterday an Iranian throws a shoe at the demented dictator Mahmoud Ahmedinajad; the same mainstream media and leftist blog reaction: big, loud yawn. Move along people, this never happened.
The man who threw his shoe at Bush had a trial and got away with a small fine.
The man who threw his shoe at Ahmedinajad is probably kept alive as we speak only to be tortured in the most unimaginable ways. Most likely he is wishing he was dead by now.
Guess which one of the two shoe throwers is a courageous hero to the Western drive-by media?
In their opinion Bush was evil incarnate and he had it coming; you cannot help but notice how many left wingers could barely help themselves not to express their disappointment the assailant didn't had a gun.
Yesterday an Iranian throws a shoe at the demented dictator Mahmoud Ahmedinajad; the same mainstream media and leftist blog reaction: big, loud yawn. Move along people, this never happened.
URUMIYE, Iran, March 6 (UPI) -- Iranian bloggers report that President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad became the target of a hurled shoe
this week as he traveled through the city of Urumiye.
While newspapers and broadcasters ignored the story, the word in the photosphere was that the president's security guards failed to find the shoe-thrower, The Guardian reports. Ahmadinejad was reported to be traveling in an open car to deliver a speech in the northwestern city.
Among Muslims, shoe-throwing is considered a deadly insult, and the Iraqi journalist who threw both his shoes at U.S. President George W. Bush, who ducked, became a hero in much of the Middle East, including Iran. The practice was also taken up by demonstrators in Iceland and other countries.
Urumiye News, an Iranian Web site, said that members of the crowd became angry after a car in the president's motorcade hit an elderly man. The man had been trying to give Ahmadinejad a letter.
In 2006, someone threw a shoe at Ahmadinejad during a protest at Amir Kabir University in Tehran.
Source
The man who threw his shoe at Bush had a trial and got away with a small fine.
The man who threw his shoe at Ahmedinajad is probably kept alive as we speak only to be tortured in the most unimaginable ways. Most likely he is wishing he was dead by now.
Guess which one of the two shoe throwers is a courageous hero to the Western drive-by media?
Labels:
ahmedinajad,
bush,
failed,
leftist,
mainstream,
marxist,
media,
obama,
shoe
Friday, March 6, 2009
Communist Party USA Digs Barak Hussein Obama
Surprised? Sam Webb, comrade secretary general of the CPUSA has a soft spot in his old communist heart for comrade Obamessiah:
So that's how the lowest of the low bottom feeding scum sucker looks like...
So that's how the lowest of the low bottom feeding scum sucker looks like...
Friday, February 27, 2009
Bailout Prize Patrol
Outstanding video, funny and most importantly it hits the nail square in the head. Or the heads of the tax and spend Democrats for that matter.
Two thumbs way up.
Two thumbs way up.
Thursday, February 26, 2009
I Told you So
Obama to Seek New Assault Weapons Ban
says the new A.G. Eric Holder.
Some say we will take up our guns and defend our rights. Good luck with that; those who will oppose the new gun ban will be painted by the media as crazed gunslingers, gun loons, people who want children to die of accidental gunshot wounds, cop killer types; in other words they will be chastised and declared an unacceptable risk to society. Armed revolt or not, in the end we still lose.
Some say we need to start to sending letters explaining to our Democrat RULERS a new ban won't do anything else but take guns from the hands of the law abiding Americans while leaving only the drug gangs armed.
That's just as useless proposition as an armed revolt. Simply because Obama and his thugs already know the new AWB won't do a damn thing to improve the security of the people in the US or Mexico. Security and less crime isn't what they want; reducing gang violence it is only the pretext to pass a law giving them more control over our lives and liberties while expanding and consolidating their power.
Liberal Democrats are fearing the guns in the hands of the American people. They know all too well revolutions against oppressive governments cannot succeed with if revolutionaries are disarmed or don't have access to small arms matching the capabilities of those issued to the troops sent out to repress the revolt.
The enemies of Liberty have the media on their side, they have control over the White House and the Legislative; they have a sizable number of Elmer Fudds who believe the 2nd Amendment it's only about their Remington 700 bolt action and the deer tag; and they also have the backstabbing AR/AK liberal rifle owner types populating gun forums. These are the most disgusting ones; until not too long ago they used to be very vocal Obama supporters claiming he and Biden are friends of gun owners and if we disagree with them we are scaremongering black helicopter conspiracy types. These days they are gone, nowhere to be found. I guess they can call their mission accomplished.
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
ACORN Taking What The Obama Campaign Promised Them
" Police in Baltimore today made what is believed to be the first arrest in a civil disobedience program aimed at supporting homeowners who refuse to vacate their foreclosed homes.
An activist with ACORN — the Association of Community Organization for Reform Now — faces criminal charges after breaking into a home in southeast Baltimore on Thursday to protest the foreclosure crisis sweeping the country.
"This is our house now," ACORN member Louis Beverly reportedly said after cutting a lock with bolt cutters at the home."
From FoxNews
Their house. Their country. Their President. Their rules, not the rule of law.
Anyone else has this strange feeling America is quickly becoming a third-world Banana Republic where a gang of thugs rules by intimidation and force?
Labels:
acorn,
communist,
manchurian,
marxist,
obamanation,
socialim
Sunday, February 22, 2009
Dr. Obama's Sensational New Discovery: "ISM"
Did you heard?
"America embraced socialISM"
Thanks but no thanks, I already had ISM in Romania for 26 years. So please Make Mine Freedom.
"America embraced socialISM"
Thanks but no thanks, I already had ISM in Romania for 26 years. So please Make Mine Freedom.
Labels:
candidate,
failed,
failure,
hussein,
islamofascist,
manchurian,
marxist,
obama,
president,
socialist
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
Obama Congratulates Chavez, Ceausescu For Democratic Re-election
"WASHINGTON (Associated Press) :
-- The Obama administration says the referendum that cleared the way for Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez to run for re-election was democratic.
In other news (this time from an alternate reality where the Berlin wall wasn't torn down in 1989)
"BUCHAREST (Scanteia) official newspaper or the Romanian Communist Party:
--President Obama sent congratulatory message to the Romanian leader Nicolae Ceausescu expressing his respect and admiration for the 89 year old communist leader, reelected tonight in a free and democratic election for the 11th time.

The same evening CNN aired the following song dedicated to the Great Romanian Leader (click play):
Ceausescu Re-elected
(1980's original Ceausescu cult of personality song)
Lyrics translated from Romanian
The Party, the country and the people
In a single mind and a single Leader
Toghether we are building the future
Towards communism we are flying ahead
Refrain:
Ceausescu re-elected at the 14th Party Congress (repeat 3 more times)
We are the masters of today and every single thing
In our country, together we are fighting
To show you that WE CAN
To dare, to wish and to HOPE
(wait...where did I heard that before?)
Refrain:
Ceausescu re-elected at the 14th Party Congress (repeat 3 more times)
The nation is proud an free
It build so many citadels
The flag of wonderful Romania
It is also proud of its country
Refrain:
Ceausescu re-elected at the 14th Party Congress (repeat 3 more times)
The Party represents the power
Leading us toward the future
The Party is the love
For our brave Leader
Refrain:
Ceausescu re-elected at the 14th Party Congress (repeat 3 more times)
President Ceausescu expressing his deep gratitude for the American comrade Obama for calling his 11th re-election "democratic":
UPDATE: Some readers complain the first piece of news, the one about the Obama administration declaring "democratic" the referendum on Chavez eligibility to run for a third Presidential to be untrue.
Got some news for you folks: it is very true. Washington Post confirms it.
As for Obama congratulating Ceausescu for his 11th "democratic" reelection, I am pretty sure he wouldn't have any problem doing it.
After all, if Obama doesn't seem to mind to call an election referendum held by a communist dictator like Chavez "democratic", why would he object to endorse the 11th re-election of another communist dictator?
Only problem is, Ceausescu is a bullet riddled rotting corpse since Christmas Day 1989 - the day he faced the Romanian peoples justice and the execution squad; therefore Obama lost another opportunity to make nice to and have a constructive, no preconditions, open dialogue with another genocidal thug.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
