Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Teleprompter: Hey Barak!

In a world exclusive, Iowahawk has somehow landed a video interview with the brains behind the Barack Obama phenomenon.

Cult Of Personality: Connecting Beloved Leaders Over Time And Continents

The first video is using images from the 80's filmed Ceausescu's Romania. It is translated and captioned in English.

The second video is very recent, perhaps only days old.
Please watch the two videoclips and tell me: do you see any difference? Because I don't.



Thursday, September 25, 2008

Obama Sends His Stormtroopers - Democrat Sheriff Deputies And Prosecutors To Supress Free Speech

In Missouri Obama is sending so-called "truth squads" - formed not by campaign workers or lawyers but by Democrat Sheriff deputies and prosecutors !!! to bring charges and prosecute anybody who is running campaign ads that His Majesty Obama considers to be slanderous and untrue. And the Democrat law enforcement officers and prosecutors are too happy to comply with orders given by their Master.

The video report is here: KMOV Channel4 TV

The Barack Obama campaign is asking Missouri law enforcement to target
anyone who lies or runs a misleading TV ad during the presidential campaign.

Guys, we are in big trouble. Stash on guns and ammunition and be ready.
We live in the times predicted by George Orwell in his book 1984

Welcome to the Soviet States Of America my friends.

Obama Campaign Tries to stop NRA ads with threats to radio/tv stations

It's ironically fitting that B. Hussein Obama attacks both, the First Amendment and the Second Amendment in the same time:

Obama Silencing Voice of Gun Owners

Barack Obama’s campaign is trying to silence the National Rifle Association’s latest ad campaign using strong arm tactics by threatening them with possible legal action if they run the ads:

Failure to prevent the airing of “false and misleading advertising” may be “probative of an underlying abdication of licensee responsibility” Cosmopolitan Broad. Corp v. FCC, 581 F.2d 917, 927 (D.C. Cir. 1978).

So basically, stop running NRA’s ads, or your broadcast license could be in jeopardy. The link to the WaPo’s Fact Check repetition as proof. This is Chicago politics at its finest folks. If you can’t win fair, win dirty. This is not how a free society is supposed to function. This is not the kind of man I want leading my country.

Besides, every bit of what NRA claimed is true. It’s the Obama campaign and the news media that’s lying.

17 page cease and desist letter from Obama Campaign

Guys, if these Stalinists take power you can kiss not only your guns goodbye, but you can say adios to your right of free speech. These jack-booted thugs have no shame and no scruples and they don't even bother to hide their communist intimidation methods anymore.

My advice: until November, put every dollar you can spare in new guns, plenty of ammo and/or reloading supplies. If Obama gets elected it won't be two years until he will have "sensible gun laws" passed prohibiting pretty much anything more powerful than a .22
Then we may see if Molon Labe still have a meaning for today's American gun owners.
"The only logical and effective response to threats from Marxist pigs is the promise of showing them the door."
--Fred Hansen

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

You Know You Want This Baby To Be Yours

Colt Super Commander Limited Edition, Custom Shop, 1 of 750 ever made in .38 Super

See the rest of the description

What are you gonna do with it?
You can defend yourself of an Islamic terrorist trying to flatten you with his SUV if you wish - that if McCain gets elected.

Or you can wrap it in cosmoline (military-grade rust preventer) and paper, then bury it in a box in a secret place in anticipation of the days when terrorist's best friend - President elect Obama will declare all semiautomatic weapons are illegal and must be banned (it's for the sake of poor innocent starving children, of course)

Whatever you plan to do you know you must have it, don't you?

Monday, September 22, 2008

NRA Is Out With New Ads Gunning For Barack O'Bambi

Wouldn't want to be Obamessiah; right now he is probably looking like a deer caught in the headlights.


Here are two of the new ads:

Way of Life


I Am The NRA And I Vote!

No other election slogan scares the gun-grabbing Democrats more. Guaranteed!

Friday, September 19, 2008

WaPo Editorialist Whines About Attorney Fees In The 2nd Amendment Civil Rights Case; Plaintiff Lawyer Replies, Mops The Floor With Him

The whine:

Holding Up Taxpayers

Lawyers in the D.C. gun case are demanding that the city pay them outsized fees.
Saturday, September 6, 2008; Page A16

TALK ABOUT adding insult to injury. The lawyers who successfully challenged the D.C. gun ban are now asking the city's taxpayers to pay their legal fees. The tab: more than $3.5 million.

Under long-established law, plaintiffs lawyers who prevail in certain kinds of civil rights cases are entitled to demand that the loser pay their legal bills. These fee-shifting statutes were enacted in large part to encourage competent lawyers to take on important civil rights cases even though many do not result in money awards. The team of lawyers that took on the District's gun ban sued under such a provision, arguing that prohibiting District residents from possessing handguns in their homes violated the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. Having won the landmark case this summer before the Supreme Court, the lawyers are entitled to compensation. What they are not entitled to is the kind of windfall they are seeking.

The lead lawyer in the case, Alan Gura, logged 1,661 hours on the case since taking it on in 2003, according to an Aug. 25 court submission. He has asked the D.C. federal trial judge overseeing the case to pay him $557 per hour; four other lawyers in the case are also seeking that rate. Two other, less experienced lawyers who worked on the case are asking for rates of $494 and $285 an hour, respectively.

Mr. Gura and his colleagues claim the $557 figure is fair because it reflects the going rate for District lawyers who have the same number of years of experience as they do. But this does not take into account the fact that these lawyers are usually with Washington megafirms that have Fortune 500 companies as clients -- and that even these companies get discounts from those astronomical rates.

For Mr. Gura, $557 an hour for 1,661 hours would mean a payday of $925,177. But it doesn't stop there. He argues that because of the "exceptional" nature of the case and the excellent results he secured for his client, he and the others are entitled to double the fees. In Mr. Gura's case, that translates to about $1.85 million -- or roughly $1,100 an hour. Even superstar lawyers in the District do not routinely command such rates.

U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan should pare back the hourly rate using an index of legal fees calculated by the Justice Department for such cases. At the very least, he should deny the request for double fees. The law requires that Mr. Gura and team receive compensation, but it does not require District residents to foot a bill that would make millionaires of its former adversaries.

The smackdown:

We Earned the Fees in the Gun Case

Thursday, September 18, 2008; Page A20

Vindication of fundamental civil rights is not an "injury," and asking that the government be held liable for the cost of enforcing our civil rights laws is no "insult" ["Holding Up Taxpayers," editorial, Sept. 6].

Enforcement of our nation's civil rights laws depends on attracting qualified lawyers to fight government agencies with endless resources on behalf of ordinary people who cannot afford legal services.

Awarding successful civil rights lawyers below-market rates for taking such enormous risks would send the bar a terrible message: Ignore injustice, unless you can afford to fight it.

Our requested rates are based on documented market realities, not on the government's wishes about what it would like to pay.

I was shocked at The Post's suggestion that civil rights lawyers are somehow the lesser relations of those who work in "megafirms" serving the Fortune 500. In any event, I and three other members of our team have worked or are still working in those "megafirms."

And if we are such lousy lawyers, how did we manage to beat the city's militia of lawyers, including three of the biggest of the "megafirms" in town?

The Supreme Court also instructs that civil rights victories in exceptional cases entitle the prevailing lawyers to enhanced fees. Our request for fee enhancement is in line with what cases involving abortion, gay rights, police misconduct and other important issues have earned the lawyers who were brave enough to back them. Would The Post feel differently if we had vindicated a right about which it were more enthusiastic, say, freedom of the press?

If the city doesn't want to pay civil rights lawyers' fees, it should obey the Constitution. Freedom isn't free.



The writer was lead counsel for Dick A. Heller in District of Columbia v. Heller, the case in which the District's ban on handgun ownership was overturned .

Saturday, September 13, 2008

Sarah Palin revives Annie Oakley Movement

From Newsoftheday

The "Lying King" Sarah Palin Parity Voice Over (Libs Exposed)

Awesome piece of captioning / parity voice-over exposing the liberal media attack dogs taking their smear orders from the Democrat bloggers.

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

Monday, September 8, 2008

Women Turning Their Backs On Obama

...and so the media manufactured God Obama ended up lying on the bare floor beaten to a pulp by a hick err...hockey mom.

New ABC poll: 20-point shift towards McCain among women since last month.

Shift, baby, shift!


Friday, September 5, 2008

Tigh - Roslin '08

Weird. Just like McCain was captured and tortured by the Vietnamese, Colonel Tigh character in Battlestar Galactica was captured, imprisoned, interrogated and tortured by the Cylon enemy.

We could only hope Sarah Palin would deal with the Islamonazi enemies the same way Madame President Laura Roslin dealt with the toasters: put them in an airlock and eject them into space.

No known source for the pic so no credit on this one

When Hippies Weep

Eco-hippies weep for fallen trees. “I want you to know, trees, that we care.”

http://view.break.com/565864 - Watch more free videos

Hand me the gun. No, the bigger one.

From David Thompson

The Latest Rassmusen Poll Numbers Spell Doom For Obama

From Rasmussen:

Palin Power: Fresh Face Now More Popular Than Obama, McCain

Eighty-nine percent (89%) of Republicans give her favorable reviews along with 33% of Democrats and 59% of voters not affiliated with either major party.
Ouch! 59% of independents like Palin. If that's not bad enough for Obama, 33% of Democrats gave Palin favorable reviews. Can you spell PUMA?

She earns positive reviews from 65% of men and 52% of women. The Friday morning update—the first to include interviews conducted after Palin’s speech--showed the beginning of a Republican convention bounce that may match Obama’s bounce from last week.
65% and 52% positive? And how many days she's in campaign? Four?

These following numbers speaks volumes about the stupidity and blind political partisanship of the liberal elites in the media. It's now confirmed middle of the road Americans have had enough of the stink-to-high-heaven propaganda crap packaged as "non-partisan news" feed to them by the so-called "professional journalists":
Fifty-one percent (51%) of Americans believe that most reporters are trying to hurt Palin’s campaign, a fact that may enhance her own ratings Fifty-one percent (51%) of Americans believe that most reporters are trying to hurt Palin’s campaign, a fact that may enhance her own ratings.

Listen to what I'm saying now guys: Obama and Biden are going down. They're going down and hard and they can blame their faithful serfs and attack dogs in the media for that. The shameless lies, smears, sexist statements and personal attacks perpetrated by the liberal elites in the media are having the opposite effect to what they hoped for; instead of helping Obama, they dug a mile deep hole in the ground and pushed him in it.

Thursday, September 4, 2008

What's a community organizer?

Frank J. over at IMAO.US has a hilarious entry about this today. I can't get a direct link to work, so I'll excerpt it here:

Q. What's a community organizer?
A. It's someone who organizes a community.

Q. And communities need organizing?
A. You think they organize themselves?

Q. I've lived in plenty of communities, and I don't remember any organizers.
A. The best community organizers seek no credit.

Q. Barack Obama seeks credit.
A. And the even better ones seek lots of credit!

Q. I still don't understand what a community organizer is supposed to do.
A. The important job of organizing the community.

Q. Like decide the layout plans of communities?
A. No. That's the job of the city and the builders.

Q. So what is the community organizer organizing?
A. Not the buildings, but the actual community.

Q. To do what?
A. To be organized!

Q. Um... so does he alphabetize the community?
A. More often he uses color coding.

Q. And someone gets paid for this?
A. It's a very important job.

Q. I still don't understand what the hell it is.
A. Maybe that's because it's such a complex occupation.

Q. Or maybe because it's a BS job Barack Obama made up.
A. It's not made up. There's even a Wikipedia article on community organizing. Here's the opening paragraph:
Community organizing is a process by which people are brought together to act in common self-interest. While organizing describes any activity involving people interacting with one another in a formal manner, much community organizing is in the pursuit of a common agenda. Many groups seek populist goals and the ideal of participatory democracy. Community organizers create social movements by building a base of concerned people, mobilizing these community members to act, and developing leadership from and relationships among the people involved.
Q. Huh?
A. See, it's very complicated and important.

Q. If it takes that many words to describe and it's still not clear what it is, I'm pretty sure it's a BS job.
A. Know what? Why don't you rot in your disorganized community you @#$%ing caveman.

Q. And who are the idiots paying these people salaries?
A. It's the community! They want this! Without the organizing there would be riots and cannibalism!

Q. I'm pretty sure we'll be fine organizing ourselves.
A. You stupid, gun-toting redneck, this is why people like us don't even bother trying to talk to people like you. You belittle important things you don't understand while clinging to your book about the invisible sky fairy!

Q. It's a made up job.
A. One day Barack Obama will force all your ignorant communities to be organized! Then you'll get your comeuppance! All of you who laughed at him, we'll see if you're laughing then!

Q. I'm pretty sure I will be laughing. I'll actually make a point of walking up to the community organizer and laughing at him because he wasn't able to get a real job.
A. Then you're just mean.

Q. Mean and working and actual job I can explain to others.
A. Hillbilly.

Wednesday, September 3, 2008

For Sarah Barracuda, Obama Is Just Chum

Silly liberals...they had no idea who were they messing with. Until tonight.

Did they thought she's called Barracuda for nothing?

Tuesday, September 2, 2008

Palin Pick Protects Pistol Power, says Gun Law Expert, and Overshadows Obama Oscillation on Second Amendment Issues

September 1 2008

“When GOP presidential nominee John McCain last Friday picked Alaska’s sharp shooting Gov. Sarah Palin for his vice-presidential running mate, the selection underscored the significance of Americans’ gun rights in the forthcoming national elections and began to galvanize the Second Amendment movement into support for the McCain candidacy,” right to self-defense advocate John M. Snyder stated here today.

“The McCain-Palin ticket,” Snyder added, “contrasts sharply with gun-grabbing records of Democratic presidential nominee Barack Hussein Obama and vice-presidential nominee Joe Biden.

“McCain signed the congressional amicus brief supporting Dick Heller’s challenge to the District of Columbia handgun ban as a violation of the individual Second Amendment civil right to keep and bear arms. Under Palin’s gubernatorial leadership, Alaska joined a multi-state amicus brief supporting Heller. Both Senators Obama and Biden refused to sign the congressional brief. The Supreme Court agreed with McCain and Palin and threw out the D.C. law in its landmark District of Columbia v. Heller decision on June 26.”

Snyder said, “While McCain notes that, ‘for more than two decades I’ve opposed efforts to ban guns,’ Obama’s been a gun banner from the get go. He has an extensive anti-gun owner public record despite his occasional euphemistic references to the Second Amendment, including the one last week in his nomination acceptance speech. He even had the cynical gall to state he agreed with the Court decision in the Heller case after his campaign had told the Chicago Tribune last November that ‘Obama believes the D.C. handgun law is constitutional.’

“When ABC’s local Washington, D.C. affiliate asked Obama: ‘One other issue that’s of great importance here in the district as well is gun control…but you support the D.C. handgun ban?’ Obama: ‘Right.’ When ABC’s Leon Harris continued with, ‘and you’ve said that it’s constitutional,’ Obama said, ‘right.’”

Snyder recalled also that an Illinois candidate questionnaire revealed Obama supported a general state handgun ban in 1996. He later “flatly denied” the handgun ban statement and blamed it on a state senate campaign staffer for incorrectly filling out the questionnaire. However, the publication Politico located a copy of the filled-out questionnaire. Obama’s own notes in his own handwriting showed that he personally checked answers and corrected them.

“Obama is a shifty character and his election to the highest office in the land would be a tragedy for America’s 80 million law-abiding gun owners and also for the entire country,” noted Snyder. “Some people in political life may try to square the circle, to claim they support both gun rights and Obama, but you can’t have it both ways. You cannot serve both freedom and Obama! You cannot honor both truth and Barack!

“Obama has supported a ban on the sale of all semiautomatic firearms. He and Biden support reinstatement of the Clinton Administration era’s ban on the sale and importation of certain semiautomatic firearms, a ban that was allowed to sunset 10 years after it took effect because of its failure as a crime control measure. Biden voted three years ago against a measure to prohibit harassing third party civil liability actions from being brought or continued against manufacturers, distributors, dealers or importers of firearms or ammunition. By contrast, McCain voted for the measure and it became law, known as the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act.”

More here

What's Not A Liberal To Hate About Sarah Palin?

Now seriously...you liberals have all the reasons to hate Sarah Palin.
She's not divorced and remmaried tree times; she's a tax cutting, straight talkin', gun tottin', Bambi huntin' good lookin' next-door type of gal. Sarah started her career from absolutely nothing but hard work and determination. As a housewife she didn't asked for the government hand-outs liberals love to push in order to keep their voter base in line. She found enough strength to raise a couple of children and in the same time to become the Governor of the largest US State.

So my liberal friends, rest assured I can understand your disdain for her perfectly. Sarah just isn't a gun hater like Obama and Hillary are. She was never a welfare queen nor accepted food stamps or any other government hand-outs. She never had any friends who are domestic terrorists. Her preacher never said God damn America. Her home in Alaska wasn't partially purchased with money from a convicted felon. Her husband is an Union card carrying member and if you'll ask him when did he started being proud of America he'll probably tell you it was in his childhood and not the day he learned his wife was VP nominee.
Sarah is strong, independent woman and has a great family. She is the American dream come true. And since she represents all that and more, I think it's understandable why you liberals love to hate her.